旧版虎视网 首页 印度人看中国 印度快讯 印度军迷 印度攻略 网贴翻译 科学探秘 印度美女 印度人文

当前位置:首页 > 印度人看中国 > 印媒:为控制人口 印度将效仿中国二胎政策?

印媒:为控制人口 印度将效仿中国二胎政策?

更新:2017-09-18 21:14:03

印媒:印度东北部一个邦已经向实施人口控制又迈进了一步,该政策将对有两个以上孩子的政府雇员实施严厉惩罚。

印度阿萨姆邦正在考虑一项提议,对政府雇员实行二胎政策。如果通过,该措施将使阿萨姆邦成为第十二个颁布这样政策的邦。

 

印度民众

 

印度网友评论:

[–]motominator -3 points 9 hours ago

Fake news. The regime will never apply it. It will be a dent to future vote bank.

假新闻,这个政权永不会使用它,它会对未来投票银行造成不利。

[–]clanlordMaharashtra 19 points 8 hours ago

India has old age issue and everyone wants security. Who will give them that their own heir. It's easy to blame old people that they produced 4-5 kids but they did it for their own safety. We have no policy for old people and the schemes are miserable. Unless we do something about pension plans and oldage schemes people will produce more babies.

印度有老人问题,每个人都想要保障。谁给呢,他们的继承人。指责老人生4~5个孩子很容易,但他们是为了自己的保障才这么做的。我们没有政策给老年人,计划也很糟糕。除非我们在养老金计划和养老计划做些事情,否则人们会生更多孩子。

[–]desidaarushitty puns ruin lives 2 points 13 hours ago

who not legalize euthanasia for old folks who can't support themselves?

为何不给那些养不起自己的老人提供合法安乐死呢?

[–]desidaarushitty puns ruin lives 7 points 5 hours ago

I would rather die than being left to beg and starve in old age.

我宁死也不想在老的时候乞讨和挨饿。

[–]KalyanibarKitna Naaye!! 3 points 4 hours ago

Is it still euthanasia if kids decide that their parents aged 60 needs to die?

如果孩子认为父母60岁了需要死了,这也算安乐死吗?

[–]SirThighPieceTunak Tunak Tun 20 points 9 hours ago

A better option would be jobs for married woman. The very fact that they remain uneducated and housebound increases the number of children. If you consider the population rate of Indian states separately, it can be seen that reduction in population rate has been achieved in better figures than China via these non coercive methods.

更好的选择是给已婚妇女工作。事实上,她们没接受教育和足不出户让孩子的数量多了。如果你关注印度各邦人口比例,可以看到人口比例的缩减达到了比中国强制执行的数据要好。

[–]serialparallelkillerTelangana 12 points 9 hours ago*

A better option would be jobs for married woman.

This is so wrong. If they have capabilities they should compete and not given favors. Job market is already saturated and I would be pissed off if I lost a job because I am a man.

;更好的选择是给已婚妇女工作。错了,如果她们有能力就该去竞争,而非被给予帮助。工作市场已经饱和了,如果我失去一份工作我会很生气,因为我是一个男人。

[–]damagecasek

Educated middle/upper middle class can barely handle the expenses of one kid.

The upper class has barely any time... or if they do produce 3+ kids... then they can afford it.

Its usually the uneducated and lower class or poor that are popping out kids. Go to any jhuggi, JJ colony or street where there are beggars.... they have 4-6 kids. Mother in laws are pregnant at the same time with their 8th child as the daughter in law's first child.

Obviously they dont care coz they dont have to spend a penny on their hospitalization or education. We are paying it with our taxes.

受过教育的中或中上层阶级几乎不能负担一个孩子的开销。

上层阶级几乎没有时间,或者如果他们真的生了3个以上的孩子,他们能养得起。

通常是没受过教育以及下层阶级或穷人一直生孩子。去到处是乞丐的jhuggi、JJ殖民地或街道,他们有4~6个孩子。岳母怀着第8个孩子,同时她的媳妇怀第一个孩子。

显然他们不在乎,因为他们不会花一分钱在住院或教育上。我们用税收来支付。

[–]pannagasamir 29 points 16 hours ago

Also lack of family planning awareness in the uneducated and lower class people about Contraception

Then there is the whole controversy regarding vasectomy thanks to sanjay gandhi and lot of myths regarding it

未受教育和底层阶级的人缺乏避孕的计划生育意识。

然后是由于桑杰·甘地以及各种流言致使的输精管切除术的争议。

[–]bikbar 13 points 14 hours ago

It can be done in some other way. All the women at the age group of 18 to 40 could be given Rs 500 per month. The condition should be having not more than 2 children. It would be a strong encouragement for birth control. Moreover, earning money will improve the position of women in the poor and backward societies. Killing of girl children and dowry related deaths will also be reduced considerably. Poor moms with some money will also results in better health and education for their children.

The cost for such a project would be like this. There are about 15 cr women at that age group; So the cost will be Rs 90000 cr per annum. The cost of all women and children related central schemes was about 180000 cr in the most recent budget. The cost of 7th cpc was more than 1lakh cr. So, it is doable.

可以用其他方式来做。18~40岁的女人每个月可以获得500卢比,条件是不能生超过2个孩子。这对生育控制是个有力的鼓励。此外,挣钱将提高女人在贫穷和落后社会的地位。杀女童和嫁妆相关死亡也将大幅减少。有点钱的穷人妈妈也会为孩子带来更好的健康和教育。

这个项目的花费应该如此。在这个年龄层大约有15000万名妇女,所以每年大约会花费9000亿卢比,最新预算中,所有妇女儿童的相关中央计划的开销是18000亿卢比,第七届CPC的成本多于10000亿卢比,所以它是可行的。

[–]hmm_ohh 3 points 4 hours ago

You would still need the women and children related schemes though.

但你仍需要为妇女儿童提供相关措施。

[–]AlphaXor 3 points 3 hours ago

All the women at the age group of 18 to 40 could be given Rs 500 per month. The condition should be having not more than 2 children.

How are you going keep track of that?

;18~40岁的女人每个月可以获得500卢比,你要怎么跟踪这个呢?

[–]AlphaXor 2 points 3 hours ago

If you want to take more than two children then be fucking rich enough to take care of them. Don't let them roll around in the footpath begging for food.

如果你想要2个以上的孩子,那就更有钱一点以便能照顾他们,不要让他们沿街乞讨。

[–]svmk1987 1 point 2 hours ago

The only people who will really get affected by this are the poor.

真正受影响的只有穷人。

[–]awkward_pause_ -3 points 16 hours ago

This can't be done in a democratic country imo. It will definitely violate the constitution. Right to privacy is definitely violated, as well integrity and dignity of life.

Any lawyer could weigh in?

这在一个MZ国家里行不通。这明显违反了宪法,隐私权完全被侵犯,以及生命的整体性和尊严。有律师来说说吗?

[–]Fukitol13 13 points 16 hours ago

Our population is too unweildy as it is.refusing to take drastic measures now will lead to collapse.

我们的人口太过剩了,现在拒绝采取措施的话将会导致崩溃。

[–]charavaka 0 points 8 hours ago

So much freedom and liberty. This is why Indian democracy will be the greatest!

如此自由与创新。这就是为什么印度皿煮最伟大。

[–]Noice_b8_m8Muth maro, insaan nhi 2 points 2 hours ago

yeah producing more and more kids will make us great !! Avant Garde!!

是哟,生越来越多的孩子会让我们变得伟大!前卫!

[–]AlphaXor 5 points 3 hours ago

Yes, right of have multiple children which will be underfed, unhealthy, uneducated and which will be used to beg when they are young and will ultimately become a criminal when they grow up.

Freedom

是啊,有多个孩子的权利,这些孩子将会营养不良、不健康、未受教育,当他们年少时会习惯乞讨,等他们长大了最终会沦为罪犯。

这就是自由。

[–]charavaka [score hidden] 40 minutes ago

Nope. Letting people make their own choices after providing them education, healthcare, housing and jobs will.

不,在提供教育、医疗、住房和就业之后,让他们自己做出选择。

热门文章推荐

阅读TOP10

蒙ICP备13000975号-8